The Conversation
Subscribe
  • Academic rigour, journalistic flair
  • For curious minds
  • Expert news and views
  • Debate and ideas
  • From the curious to the serious

Hot Topics

  1. Gay marriage
  2. Australia in the Asian Century
  3. Convergence review
  4. Federal Budget 2012
  5. War on drugs
  6. Medical myths
  7. Bob Brown
  8. Square Kilometre Array
  9. Explainer
  10. Transparency and medicine

Cutting growth, emissions doesn’t mean giving up the good life

Countries with high incomes and high carbon emissions do not achieve higher life expectancies than those with moderate incomes and lower carbon emissions, a new study finds.

The finding challenges the assumption that human well-being requires growth in both economic activity and carbon emissions.

The study highlights alternative development plans that place a priority on human well-being and climate protection over demands for economic growth.

Researchers investigated links between carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, economic wealth, and life expectancy and found that, ideally, from a sustainable development perspective, countries would achieve both high incomes and high life expectancies at low levels of carbon emissions.

Read more at Futurity

Join the conversation

Post a Comment

There are no comments on this article yet.
To have your say and join The Conversation please sign in if you have an account already, or sign up.