It’s normal to feel down in the dumps from time to time, so drawing a line between low moods and mental illness is understandably fraught.
But are health professionals treating normal sadness as a clinical disorder and over-prescribing antidepressants?
Or is depression a disease manufactured by Big Pharma to sell more antidepressants, as some have suggested?
The reality is depression can affect both mental and physical wellbeing. In extreme cases, depression can lead to suicide. So it’s no surprise many clinicians err on the side of caution when it comes to prescribing antidepressants.
Efficacy of antidepressants
Most antidepressants work by increasing neurotransmitters such as serotonin and noradrenaline in the brain.
For over 40 years, researchers have thought depression could be caused by a deficiency in one or more neurotransmitters. This hypothesis continues to stimulate scientific research, which is increasingly focusing on the contribution of genetic and environmental factors.
The most commonly-prescribed class of antidepressant – selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (or SSRIs), such as Prozac – increase the amount of serotonin available to receptors in the brain.
Other commonly prescribed antidepressants – the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (or SNRIs), such as Efexor increase both serotonin and noradrenaline.
Some have questioned the usefulness of all antidepressants, leading to media headlines declaring that “Antidepressants don’t work!”. But depression is a complex disorder and patients often need to try a number of antidepressants before finding one that works for them.
Side effects
Antidepressants have a variety of side effects including reduced libido, agitation, weight gain and even suicidal ideation in children and adolescents.
“Modern” antidepressants such as Prozac or Efexor may have adverse cardiovascular effects although not to the same extent as the older-style “tricyclic” antidepressants, which are still prescribed for more severe cases of depression.
Medications to treat other health concerns are also being found to improve depressive symptoms. Professor Ian Hickie and Associate Professor Naomi Rogers from the University of Sydney and Central Queensland University, recently published a review article on novel antidepressant therapies in The Lancet medical journal.
They suggest that melatonin-based therapies such as agomelatine, usually used to treat sleep disorders, may have antidepressant effects and fewer side-effects than antidepressants, as well as improved sleep quality.
The link between mental and physical health
The brain has enjoyed a privileged status in psychology and psychiatry, in part due to recent scientific advances in neuroscience. But the heart also plays an important role in our emotional life.
We noted in our last Conversation article that people with depression are three to four times more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than those without depression, irrespective of a prior history of cardiovascular disease.
So if depression can break your heart, are antidepressants able to put it back together again? Our research shows that while they might reduce depressive symptoms, the answer is no.
Treatment with a variety of antidepressants may improve mental wellbeing but it doesn’t lower the risk of heart disease associated with depression. More concerning is new data indicating that antidepressants themselves may have adverse effects.
Depression and cardiovascular disease are forecast to be the two greatest burdens of disease by 2020 and the two are related, highlighting the urgent need for new treatments.
Hickie and Rogers' review highlights the potential for novel antidepressant treatment with reduced side effects. Although further research is required, a relatively safe cardiovascular profile has been reported for these novel antidepressants.
Other treatment options
Other treatment options – especially for milder forms of depression – include exercise, meditation and cognitive behavioural therapy.
These non-pharmacological options are better tolerated by patients with depression, and have fewer side effects than antidepressant medication.
It’s also possible that these alternatives, particularly exercise, have cardio-protective effects which may help reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.
St. John’s Wort, a plant extract has also been found to be as effective as standard antidepressants in reducing mild to moderate depression.
A combination of antidepressant medication and psychological interventions may be beneficial for moderate or severe forms of depression.
Working out what’s best
It can be difficult to navigate competing messages from the media, family and friends, and even health professionals about the different pathways available for depression treatment.
If you are looking online for information, visit credible, evidence-based sites such as National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and Beyond Blue.
Remember, it can take a fair bit of trial and error to work out which, if any antidepressant, is right for you. If you’re not happy with the advice you’re getting from your GP, psychologist or other health professional, why not seek a second opinion?
Are you confused about depression treatments? Leave your comments below
5 Comments
Melissa Raven
Adjunct lecturer at Flinders University
The Hickie and Rogers review cited in this article emphasises that agomelatine has less potential for gastrointestinal, sexual, or metabolic side-effects than many other antidepressants. Notably, however, there is no mention of adverse hepatic (liver) effects. The Australian Prescriber review concluded that Valdoxan was relatively ineffective and potentially dangerous:
show full comment'Although agomelatine reduces symptoms of depression on the Hamilton rating scale, its effect seems to be only marginally better…
Ken Sekiya
logged in via Twitter
A Natural Therapist, who worked very closely with Patients prescribed onto "Antidepressants" (for a long -term [10 mth] period), to slowly get them off - found all of them had improved drastically after being eased off "Antidepressants", with aid of homoeopathic alternatives.
Pharmaceutical-grade medication should only be short-term and temporary relief.
(Morphine also needs more scrutiny in the area of "medically authorised" long-term use)
Most illnesses that aren't solved after 8 months of…
show full commentPaul Richards
Ken
your contribution to The Conversation is welcome and raises the infrequently talked about placebo affect. This will always be taken into account and encouraged by good medical professionals.
If you choose to embrace the one of caring professions, and work with in the Medical System in Australia, you will see that all patients are encouraged to bring their faith based CAM medication along to aid in healing.
However expecting Australian Government research into "natural therapies" when all the studies and peer reviewed responses published worldwide regarding these alternatives are readily available for review would be pointless.
When you say that the U.S. and other countries recognise various CAM medication or practices given the arena, it would be a great idea to cite the relevant study and peer reviewed research on the outcome you elude to.
Wishing you well Paul.
Ken Sekiya
logged in via Twitter
I've looked through, so called "Research" on natural therapies - and its a consistent as Politicians. The term "Natural Therapies"is bastardised by a range of single-method methodologies - mainly focused on commensurable products.
The sole creditable research that I'm able to find are either multi-method treatments, or rare for established natural therapies such as Physiotherapy and Chiropractic therapy.
Hence why I called for research to be done in Australia, without restriction by Government or Pharmaceutical companies.
My main point was that Australia has an over-reliance of single-method therapies and medication, and has a need for Health to move away from over-specialisation (and an discouraging referral system) and towards multi-method patient focused healthcare.
Geoffrey Ahern
Clinical Nurse Specialist and Educator
logged in via email @gmail.com
Dear Paul
Your comment that, "you will see that all patients are encouraged to bring their faith based CAM medication along to aid in healing" is intriguing to me.
Where do you see this happening? I have been working in the public health system (Emergecny, ICU and Inpatient and Community Mental Health) in Australia for 15 years and not on one single ocassion have I seen this happen.
Patients who bring their faith based CAM medication are looked upon with a degree on contempt at best and…
show full comment